From: Ali J. Nabavi <ali>
Date: Sun, Nov 14, 2021, 3:27 PM
Subject: Fwd: Communications–Nabavi matter
To: WordPress (hourback) <kovo027nidu>

From: Trey O’Cain <trey>
Date: Sun, Nov 14, 2021 at 6:19 AM
Subject: Re: Communications–Nabavi matter
To: Ali J. Nabavi <ali>
Cc: Robert L. Spotswood <lawfirm218.agj>

I am not her intermediary. There is an order in place that prohibits you from having any contact with Karen at all.

At this time, the intention of the order, the intention of Karen, the intention of the lawyers, and the intention of the legal process following a final hearing on litigated matters is that the parties abide by the ruling of the court and move on. In your case, as painful as it may be for you, that means not having any further contact. Your time to ask questions and confront the issues before the court was on the day of trial. Unfortunately, you were not present, but your lawyer did an outstanding job for you in your absence. There is currently no avenue and no audience for you to ask Karen any questions.

Trey

Kenneth T. O’Cain
O’Cain | Ginn
567 Highway 51
Suite C
Ridgeland, MS 39157
Office: (601) 790-9344
Facsimile: (601) 300-8088
Email: trey

On Nov 13, 2021, at 10:48 PM, Ali J. Nabavi <ali> wrote:

Mr. O’Cain,

Thank you for contacting me. So far you are the only person who has the constitution or grit to actually converse with me.

On Sat, Nov 13, 2021, 5:54 AM Trey O’Cain <trey> wrote:

Mr. Nabavi:

I have been informed that you have been attempting to contact Karen’s attorneys over the last several days.

Yes. And how does it make sense that you are involved with this situation? I am trying to communicate with my ex-wife through the channels presented to me and they’re diverting my communications to a guardian ad litem? How does that make sense?

Please note that Karen’s attorneys are ethically prohibited from any direct communications with you.

I beg to differ. I am unaware of any legal precedent that prohibits a person from contacting the representative of another person. I would like you to cite a law that prohibits these people from communicating with me. It is simply that they choose not to communicate with me. That is what I would argue. They are stonewalling just as my ex-wife has been for years.

Also, the matter is closed. If you have any need for discussions in relation to this case, I would first encourage you to speak with your attorney.

What would that benefit? I have already spoken with my attorney and he advised me to contact my ex-wife’s counsel in order to speak with her, since the idiot judge’s court order prevents me from contacting her directly that would be the only avenue available to me.

I will also make myself available to communicate with you as well within reason. My contact information is below. Call me if you have any questions.

I don’t know if I have any questions for you but I do have some for Karen. So how shall I get them answered? If you are putting yourself forward as her representative or intermediary then please confirm that and I will put all of my communications to you instead of her cowardly self or her irresponsible legal counsel. Otherwise, I don’t understand why I’m speaking with you now.

-Ali

Thanks,

Trey

Kenneth T. O’Cain
O’Cain | Ginn, PLLC567 Highway 51, Suite C
Ridgeland, MS 39157
Office: 601.790.9344Direct: 601.647.9800Facsimile: 601.885.4563
Email: trey

Please note my new email address. Trey O’Cain and Josh Ginn have teamed up and are now helping clients with their legal issues under O’Cain | Ginn, PLLC. We are excited about this transition and are pleased to be able to continue our legacy of providing timely, aggressive representation to all our clients through these combined resources.